טראמפ קאמפיין באשולדיגט ביידען קאמפיין אין פעלשערייען דורך די דאמיניאן פירמע

באריכטן און אנאליזן

די אחראים: אחראי, געלעגער

האמת הצפון
שר חמישים ומאתים
תגובות: 464
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מיטוואך יוני 03, 2020 9:21 pm

טראמפ קאמפיין באשולדיגט ביידען קאמפיין אין פעלשערייען דורך די דאמיניאן פירמע

תגובהדורך האמת הצפון » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:37 pm

היות עס קומט א איבערקערעניש איבער די נושא מיין איך אז דאס פארדינט א באזונדערע אשכול איבער אלע נייעס אויפדעקונגען און אנטוויקלינגען איבער די נושא,
ווייסט וואספארא סארט מענטש ער איז? ער איז פון די וואס האלטן אז טראמפ האט "יא" געווינען די וואלן!

אביסל טיפער
שר האלף
תגובות: 1504
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מוצ"ש ינואר 11, 2020 8:09 pm
לאקאציע: לאנדאן 1935

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך אביסל טיפער » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:38 pm

א דאנק פארן גיין פתיחה
ספענט 40$ און באקומט 40$ דורך זיך אויפסיינען דא
און אזוי אויך באקומט איהר קעשבעק ווען איהר קויפט איין נאכן זיך אויפסיינען

"און פארגעסט נישט אז תורה איז די בעסטע סחורה"

אוסף אמרים
שר מאה
תגובות: 207
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג מאי 07, 2020 2:09 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך אוסף אמרים » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:43 pm

וואלט אפשר געוועהן כדי אז סיי ווער וואס קען די נושא זאל אויסשמיעסען די היסטוריע פון וואל מאשינען. וויאזוי עס ארבעט א.א.וו. און מהנה זיין דעם עולם

אוועטאר
פעיק ניוז
שר עשרת אלפים
תגובות: 11403
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג יוני 13, 2017 8:49 pm
לאקאציע: אנאנימע סאורסעס

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך פעיק ניוז » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:48 pm

קען איינער אויסשמועסן: וואס איז די אויפגאבע פון דעם סאפטוועיר? וואו קענען געשאפן ווערן לעכער? און אויף וואס פונקטליך טענה'ן טראמפ'ס לויער'ס אז זיי האבן עווידענס?
Typing / Editing / Translating / Layout / Printing

פארבינדט אייך צו: Fakenewsivelt@gmail.com

אוועטאר
Goodmorning
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3845
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך Goodmorning » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:54 pm

DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CATEGORICALLY DENIES FALSE ASSERTIONS ABOUT VOTE SWITCHING ISSUES WITH OUR VOTING SYSTEMS.

According to a Joint Statement by the federal government agency that oversees U.S. election security, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised." The government & private sector councils that support this mission called the 2020 election "the most secure in American history."

1) VOTE DELETION/SWITCHING ASSERTIONS ARE COMPLETELY FALSE.

An unsubstantiated claim about the deletion of 2.7 million pro-Trump votes that was posted on the Internet and spread on social media has been taken down and debunked by independent fact-checkers.

Edison Research (ER) has refuted any claims that company data suggests any voting irregularities, including vote switching. ER President Larry Rosin told The Dispatch Fact Check, "Edison Research created no such report and we are not aware of any voter fraud."
Claims that 941,000 votes for President Trump in Pennsylvania were deleted are impossible, as Dominion only serves 14 Commonwealth counties. Collectively, those Counties produced 1.3 million votes representing a voter turnout of 76%. Fifty-two percent of those votes went to President Trump, which amounts to 676,000 votes the company's system processed for the President in Pennsylvania.
2) DOMINION IS A NONPARTISAN U.S. COMPANY.

Dominion has no company ownership relationships with any member of the Pelosi family, the Feinstein family, or the Clinton Global Initiative, Smartmatic, Scytl, or any ties to Venezuela. Dominion works with all political parties; our customer base and our government outreach practices reflect this nonpartisan approach.

As reported by the Associated Press, "Dominion made a one-time philanthropic commitment at a Clinton Global Initiative meeting in 2014, but the Clinton Foundation has no stake or involvement in Dominion's operations, the nonprofit confirmed." The meeting included bipartisan attendees focused on international democracy-building.
There have been no "raids" of Dominion servers by the U.S. military or otherwise, and Dominion does not have servers in Germany.
3) THERE WERE NO DOMINION SOFTWARE GLITCHES AND BALLOTS WERE ACCURATELY TABULATED. THE RESULTS ARE 100% AUDITABLE.

No credible reports or evidence of any software issues exist. Dominion equipment is used by county and state officials to tabulate ballots. Human errors related to reporting tabulated results have arisen in a few counties, including some using Dominion equipment, but appropriate procedural actions were made by the county to address these errors were made prior to the canvass process.

The Michigan Secretary of State's office offers a Fact Check Page which debunks false or erroneous claims about voting in Detroit, as well as a user-error incident in Antrim County.
The Georgia Secretary of State has also repeatedly stated throughout the count that "[a]s the work goes on, I want to assure Georgia voters that every legal vote was cast and accurately counted."
4) NO UNAUTHORIZED OR LAST-MINUTE SOFTWARE UPDATES OCCURRED.

Claims about software updates being done the night before Election Day are 100% false.

Both Spalding County and the Georgia Secretary of State have verified that a) this type of unauthorized update is impossible, and b) the actual logs from equipment under the custody of the county determined an update did NOT happen the night before the election.
Georgia Voting System Implementation Manager Gabe Sterling has independently, and unequivocally, rebutted inaccurate claims made about an update to machines on the eve of the election. He affirmed in his daily press briefing on November 9 that "nothing was done to the [PollPad] system after [October 31]," when voter files were updated as part of normal procedure.
5) THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH THE USE OF SHARPIE PENS.

Election officials provide writing instruments that are approved for marking ballots to all in-person voters using hand-marked paper ballots. Dominion Voting Systems machines can read all of these instruments, including Sharpies.

The DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, "if a ballot has issues that impacts its ability to be scanned, it can be hand counted." The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors assured voters that "sharpies do not invalidate ballots." Dominion has stated that "Sharpie pens are safe and reliable to use on ballots, and recommended due to their quick-drying ink."
6) ASSERTIONS OF VOTER FRAUD CONSPIRACIES ARE 100% FALSE.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has debunked numerous claims, including claims about the existence of a secret CIA program for vote fraud called Hammer and Scorecard.
All U.S. voting systems must provide assurance that they work accurately and reliably as intended under federal U.S. EAC and state certification and testing requirements. Election safeguards - from testing and certification of voting systems, to canvassing and auditing - prevent malicious actors from tampering with vote counts and ensure that final vote tallies are accurate. Read more from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד

אוועטאר
א צווייטער
שר חמש מאות
תגובות: 999
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג אוגוסט 25, 2020 2:45 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך א צווייטער » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:55 pm

אידיש פליז, פאר די פאר אידיש רעדענדע.
א ידען מיינט נישט ער איז קלוג, א חכם מיינט נישט ער איז א ידען.


אוועטאר
Goodmorning
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3845
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך Goodmorning » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:56 pm

This webpage is for people with questions about the security of their vote and preemptively debunks potential areas for disinformation. You can learn more about mis- and disinformation from CISA’s Countering Foreign Influence Task Force. Click an icon below to go directly to that section.


Post-Election Pre-Election Election Day
NEW
Reality: Robust safeguards including canvassing and auditing procedures help ensure the accuracy of official election results.

Rumor: A bad actor could change election results without detection.

Get the Facts: The systems and processes used by election officials to tabulate votes and certify official results are protected by various safeguards that help ensure the accuracy of election results. These safeguards include measures that help ensure tabulation systems function as intended, protect against malicious software, and enable the identification and correction of any irregularities.

Every state has voting system safeguards to ensure each ballot cast in the election can be correctly counted. State procedures often include testing and certification of voting systems, required auditable logs, and software checks, such as logic and accuracy tests, to ensure ballots are properly counted before election results are made official. With these security measures, election officials can check to determine that devices are running the certified software and functioning properly.

Every state also has laws and processes to verify vote tallies before results are officially certified. State processes include robust chain-of-custody procedures, auditable logs, and canvass processes. The vast majority of votes cast in this election will be cast on paper ballots or using machines that produce a paper audit trail, which allow for tabulation audits to be conducted from the paper record in the event any issues emerge with the voting system software, audit logs, or tabulation. These canvass and certification procedures are also generally conducted in the public eye, as political party representatives and other observers are typically allowed to be present, to add an additional layer of verification. This means voting system software is not a single point of failure and such systems are subject to multiple audits to ensure accuracy and reliability. For example, some counties conduct multiple audits, including a post-election logic and accuracy test of the voting system, and a bipartisan hand count of paper ballots.

Useful Sources

Election Results Reporting Risks and Mitigations, CISA
Election Infrastructure Cyber Risk Assessment, CISA
Mail-in Voting Integrity Safeguards, CISA
Mail-in Voting Processing Factors Map, CISA
Post-Election Process Mapping Infographic, CISA
Your local or state election officials. EAC state-by-state directory
Post-election audits, NCSL
Policies for Election Observers, NSCL
Tabulation Security, Maricopa County AZ
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor17


POST-ELECTION
Reality: Voter registration list maintenance and other election integrity measures protect against voting illegally on behalf of deceased individuals.

Rumor: Votes are being cast on behalf of dead people and these votes are being counted.

Get the Facts: State and Federal laws prohibit voter impersonation, including casting a ballot on behalf of a deceased individual. Election officials regularly remove deceased individuals from voter registration rolls based on death records shared by state vital statistics agencies and the Social Security Administration. While there can be some lag time between a person’s death and their removal from the voter registration list, which can lead to some mail-in ballots being delivered to addresses of deceased individuals, death records provide a strong audit trail to identify any illegal attempts to cast ballots on behalf of deceased individuals. Additional election integrity safeguards, including signature matching and information checks, further protect against voter impersonation and voting by ineligible persons.

In some instances, living persons may return mail-in ballots or vote early in-person, and then die before Election Day. Some states permit such voters’ ballots to be counted, while others disallow such ballots and follow procedures to identify and reject them during processing.

Taken out of context, some voter registration information may appear to suggest suspicious activity, but are actually innocuous clerical errors or the result of intended data practices. For example, election officials in some states use temporary placeholder data for registrants whose birth date or year is not known (e.g., 1/1/1900, which makes such registrants appear to be 120 years old). In other instances, a voting-age child with the same name and address as their deceased parent could be misinterpreted as a deceased voter or lead to clerical errors.

Useful Sources

18 U.S.C. § 1708
52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 20507, 20511(2), 21083(a)(2)(A)
Mail-in Voting Integrity Safeguards, CISA
Mail-in Voting 2020 Risk Assessment, CISA
Election Infrastructure Security, CISA
Election Security, DHS
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993: Questions and Answers, DOJ
Election Mail Information Center, USPS
Your local or state election officials. EAC state-by-state directory
Maintenance of State Voter Registration Lists, NASS
What If an Absentee Voter Dies Before Election Day?, NCSL
Voter List Accuracy, NCSL
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor21


Reality: Variations in vote totals for different contests on the same ballot occur in every election and do not by themselves indicate fraud or issues with voting technology.

Rumor: More votes in one contest than other contests on the ballot means that results cannot be trusted.

Get the Facts: Variations in vote totals for different contests on the same ballot occur in every election. For example, this can occur as a result of “undervotes.” These variations by themselves are not indications of issues with voting technology or the integrity of election processes or results.

An undervote occurs when a voter intentionally or unintentionally does not make a selection in a given contest on their ballot (e.g., a voter votes for a presidential candidate, but not for any candidates in other contests on their ballot) or, where a voter selects fewer than the maximum number allowed for a particular contest. Undervotes commonly occur on so-called “down-ballot” races. For example, a voter may choose to vote for president, senator, and governor, but not for other offices or ballot measures that are lower down on their ballot. Even if a ballot includes an undervote in a particular contest, properly marked votes on their ballot are counted.

Useful Sources

Your local or state election officials. EAC state-by-state directory
Voter Intent Laws, NCSL
Post-Election Audits, NCSL
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor20


Reality: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) do not design or audit ballots, which are processes managed by state and local election officials.

Rumor: DHS or CISA printed paper ballots with security measures and is auditing results as a countermeasure against ballot counterfeiting.

Get the Facts: While DHS and CISA assist states and localities with securing election infrastructure, DHS and CISA do not design, print, or audit ballots. State and local election officials manage ballot design and printing, as well as the auditing of results.

Local election offices have security and detection measures in place that make it highly difficult to commit fraud through counterfeit ballots. While the specific measures vary, in accordance with state and local election laws and practices, ballot security measures can include signature matching, information checks, barcodes, watermarks, and precise paper weights.

DHS and CISA operate in support of state and local election officials, and do not administer elections or handle ballots. CISA’s role in election security includes sharing information, such as cyber threat indicators, with state and local election officials, as well as providing technical cybersecurity services (e.g., vulnerability scanning) upon the request of those officials. CISA funded an independent third-party to develop an open-source election auditing tool for voluntary use by state and local election officials. (Note: The previous sentence was updated 9 November 2020.) CISA does not audit elections and does not have access to the tool as states use it.

Useful Sources

Election Infrastructure Security, CISA
Election Security, DHS
Federal Role in U.S. Campaigns and Elections: An Overview, CRS
Mail-in Voting Integrity Safeguards, CISA
Mail-in Voting 2020 Risk Assessment, CISA
Risk-Limiting Audits with Arlo, Voting Works
Your local or state election officials EAC state-by-state directory
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor19


Reality: Election results reporting may occur more slowly than prior years. This does not indicate there is any problem with the counting process or results. Official results are not certified until all validly cast ballots have been counted, including ballots that are counted after election night.

Rumor: If results as reported on election night change over the ensuing days or weeks, the process is hacked or compromised, so I can’t trust the results.

Get the Facts: Elections will look different this year amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Although ballot processing in some states may take longer than in past years due to increases in mail-in ballot usage and process adaptations to make voting safer during the pandemic, this does not impact the accuracy of the counting process. Election results reported on election night are always unofficial and are provided solely for voters’ convenience. In fact, no state requires that official results be certified on election night itself. Fluctuations in unofficial results reporting will occur during and after election night as more ballots are processed and counted, often including military and overseas ballots, and validated provisional ballots. Variations in state processes may also mean ballots cast through different methods (e.g., early in-person voting, mail-in voting, and election day voting) are counted and unofficially reported in different orders. Official results are released after rigorous canvassing (verification) and certification by local and state election officials.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Foreign Actors and Cybercriminals Likely to Spread Disinformation Regarding 2020 Election Results
Election Results Reporting Risks and Mitigations, CISA
Mail-in Voting 2020 Risk Assessment, CISA
Mail-in Voting Integrity Safeguards, CISA
Mail-in Voting Processing Factors Map, CISA
Post-Election Process Mapping Infographic, CISA
USPS Election Mail Information Center, USPS
Federal Election Results FAQs, CRS
State Election Canvassing Timeframes and Recount Thresholds, NASS
After the Voting Ends: The Steps to Complete an Election, NCSL
Election Security State Policies, NCSL
Changes to Mail in Voting in 2020, NCSL
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor14


Reality: Provisional ballots are counted in every election regardless of result margins.

Rumor: Provisional ballots are only counted if there’s a close race.

Get the Facts: All provisional ballots are reviewed by election officials in every election regardless of result margins. Provisional ballots cast by individuals whose eligibility can be verified are counted. Additionally, election officials are required to provide individuals who cast provisional ballots written information regarding how they can determine whether their vote was counted and, if it was not counted, the reason for its rejection.

Useful Sources

52 U.S.C. § 21082
Post-Election Process Mapping Infographic, CISA
Provisional Ballots, NCSL
State Policies on Voting In-Person or Changing Vote After Requesting a Mail/Absentee Ballot, NASS
Your local or state election officials. EAC state-by-state directory
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor15


Reality: In some circumstances, elections officials are permitted to “duplicate” or otherwise further mark cast ballots to ensure they can be properly counted.

Rumor: Witnessing election officials marking ballots means that fraudulent voting is taking place.

Get the Facts: Some ballots cannot be read by a ballot scanner due to issues such as damage or misprinting. Some jurisdictions hand count such ballots, while others create duplicate ballots so they can be read by a ballot scanner. Some jurisdictions permit election officials to enhance markings on ballots that are too faint to scan following a process to adjudicate the voter’s intent based on state law. In jurisdictions where duplication of unscannable ballots is permitted, election officials duplicate the ballot precisely to ensure all the voter’s choices are transferred correctly to the new ballot. Both the original and duplicate ballot are labeled and logged so that the two ballots can be tracked and audited. Many jurisdictions require bipartisan teams of two or four personnel to complete this process and verify that votes are accurately transferred to duplicated ballots. The process is often open to public observation.

In some jurisdictions, ballot duplication is referred to as ballot remaking, ballot replication, or ballot transcription.

Useful Sources

After the Voting Ends: The Steps to Complete an Election, NCSL
Ballot Duplication blog series, Council of State Governments Overseas Voting Initiative
Your local or state election officials EAC state-by-state directory.
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor16


Reality: Election night results are not official results.

Rumor: If election night reporting sites experience an outage, vote counts will be lost or manipulated.

Get the Facts: Election night results are not official results. These sites may experience outages due to a variety of issues including too many people trying to view the site or cyberattacks. Such disruptions do not impact the integrity of votes or the official certified results. Election results made available on election night are always unofficial. Official results are rigorously canvassed (reviewed), and certified by local and state election officials. Most states have requirements for post-election audits as well.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Foreign Actors and Cybercriminals Likely to Spread Disinformation Regarding 2020 Election Results
FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Cyber Threats to Voting Processes Could Slow But Not Prevent Voting
Post-Election Process Mapping Infographic, CISA
Federal Election Results FAQs, CRS
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor11


Reality: A defaced or manipulated election night reporting webpage would not impact counting and certification of official results.

Rumor: If the election night reporting webpage is defaced or displays incorrect results, the integrity of the election is compromised.

Get the Facts: If a webpage has been defaced or is displaying incorrect results, it would not impact the integrity of votes or the official certified results. Election results made available on election night are always unofficial.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Foreign Actors and Cybercriminals Likely to Spread Disinformation Regarding 2020 Election Results
FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Cyber Threats to Voting Processes Could Slow But Not Prevent Voting
Post-Election Process Mapping Infographic, CISA
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor12

Reality: Malicious actors can use fake personas and impersonate real accounts.

Rumor: If a social media account claims an identity, the account must be run by that person or organization.

Get the Facts: Malicious actors often use fake personas and impersonate real accounts to trick the public into believing disinformation, including election-related disinformation.

Popular social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, and others provide an indication, such as a checkmark that is either blue or grey, to indicate that an account is verified by the platform. If an account claims to be a well-known person or official organization but is not verified, they may be an imposter.

There are multiple things to look for if you think an account is fake or spoofed. Is the account brand new? Do they create content or merely re-share? Do they have a coherent profile description and does it match what they are sharing? Do they have a real profile photo? A best practice when looking for election-related information is to go to trusted sources, like your local election official.

If you find a suspicious social media post or account, consider reporting the activity to the platform so others don’t get duped. Most platforms have a “report” function built into posts, so it’s easy to report suspicious items, such as misinformation about election infrastructure. If an account is posting election disinformation, consider reporting to your state or local election official.

Useful Sources

CISA Disinformation Toolkit
#TrustedInfo2020, NASS
Voter Resources: State Voter Information, NASED
Voting and Elections Information, usa.gov
Your local or state election officials EAC state-by-state directory
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor1


Reality: Cyber actors can "spoof" or forge email sender addresses to look like they come from someone else.

Rumor: I received an election-related email that looks like it came from a certain organization, so the organization must have sent it.

Get the Facts: Cyber actors can forge emails to look like they came from someone else. This common tactic is called email spoofing, where attackers send an email pretending to be from a specific domain or organization in an attempt to harvest personal data or spread malware. Such spoofed emails can also be used to disseminate false or inflammatory information. To send realistic-looking emails, cyber actors may forge the sender address to hide the origin of an email or set up spoofed domains that have a slightly different name from the real domain. Always be wary of out of the ordinary emails and look to trusted sources, such as the organization’s official website, in order to verify. Never provide personal information or download files from suspicious emails. If you receive a suspicious election-related email, consider reporting it to your local election official or local FBI field office.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Spoofed Internet Domains and Email Accounts Pose Cyber and Disinformation Risks to Voters
Actions to Counter Email-based Attacks on Election-Related Entities, CISA
Enhanced Email and Web Security, CISA
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor2


PRE-ELECTION
Reality: Some voter registration data is publicly available.

Rumor: Someone possessing or posting voter registration data means voter registration databases have been hacked.

Get the Facts: Some voter registration information is public information and is available to political campaigns, researchers, and often members of the public, frequently for purchase. According to a recent FBI and CISA public alert, cyber actors may make false claims of “hacked” voter information to undermine confidence in U.S. democratic institutions.

Useful Sources

Availability of State Voter File and Confidential Information
FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: False Claims of Hacked Voter Information Likely Intended to Cast Doubt on Legitimacy of U.S. Elections
Access To and Use Of Voter Registration Lists, NCSL
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor3


Reality: Online voter registration websites can experience outages for non-malicious reasons.

Rumor: An online voter registration website experiences an outage and claims are made the election has been compromised.

Get the Facts: Outages in online voter registration systems occur for a variety of reasons, including configuration errors, hardware issues, natural disasters, communications infrastructure issues, and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. As CISA and FBI warned in a recent public alert, a system outage does not necessarily mean the integrity of voter registration information or any other election system has been impacted. When an outage occurs, election officials work to verify the integrity of voter registration information.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: False Claims of Hacked Voter Information Likely Intended to Cast Doubt on Legitimacy of U.S. Elections
Securing Voter Registration Data, CISA
Your local or state election officials EAC state-by-state directory
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor4


Reality: A compromise of a state or local government system does not necessarily mean election infrastructure or the integrity of your vote has been compromised.

Rumor: If state or local jurisdiction information technology (IT) has been compromised, the election results cannot be trusted.

Get the Facts: Hacks of state and local IT systems should not be minimized; however, a compromise of state or local IT systems does not mean those systems are election-related. Even if an election-related system is compromised, a compromise of a system does not necessarily mean the integrity of the vote has been affected. Election officials have multiple safeguards and contingencies in place, including provisional ballots or backup paper poll books that limit the impact from a cyber incident with minimal disruption to voting. Additionally, having an auditable paper record ensures that the vote count can be verified and validated.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: Cyber Threats to Voting Processes Could Slow But Not Prevent Voting
Election Infrastructure Cyber Risk Assessment, CISA
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor5


Reality: Malicious actors can fake manipulation of voter registration data to spread disinformation.

Rumor: Videos, images or emails suggesting voter registration information is being manipulated means voters will not be able to vote.

Get the Facts: Claims are easy to fake and can be used for disinformation purposes. If voter registration data were to be manipulated, states have several safeguards in place to enable voters to vote, including offline backups of registration data, provisional ballots, and in several states, same-day registration.

Useful Sources

FBI-CISA Public Service Announcement: False Claims of Hacked Voter Information Likely Intended to Cast Doubt on Legitimacy of U.S. Elections
Securing Voter Registration Data, CISA
Securing Voter Registration Systems, NCSL
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor6


Reality: Safeguards are in place to prevent home-printed or photocopied mail-in ballots from being counted.

Rumor: A malicious actor can easily defraud an election by printing and sending in extra mail-in ballots.

Get the Facts: This is false. Committing fraud through photocopied or home-printed ballots would be highly difficult to do successfully. This is because each local election office has security measures in place to detect such malicious activity. While the specific measures vary, in accordance with state and local election laws and practices, such security measures include signature matching, information checks, barcodes, watermarks, and precise paper weights.

Useful Source

Mail-in Voting Election Integrity Safeguards Infographic, CISA
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor7


Reality: Safeguards are in place to protect against fraudulent voting using the Federal Write-In Absentee Ballot (FWAB).

Rumor: A malicious actor can easily defraud an election using the Federal Write-In Absentee Ballot (FWAB).

Get the Facts: Changing an election using fraudulently submitted FWABs would be highly difficult to do. This is because election offices have security measures in place to detect such activity.

The FWAB is primarily used as a backup ballot for military and overseas voters who requested but did not yet receive their absentee ballot. FWAB users must provide their signature and meet varying state voter registration and absentee ballot request requirements, which can include provision of full or partial social security number, state identification number, proof of identification, and/or witness signature.

Since only military and overseas voters are eligible to use the FWAB, relatively few of them are submitted each election. In 2016, states reported that only 23,291 total FWABs were submitted nationwide, with all but six states receiving less than 1,000 FWABs statewide. Since use is relatively rare, spikes in FWAB usage would be detected as anomalous.

Useful Sources

52 U.S.C. § 20303
Voting Assistance Guide, FVAP
Election Forms and Tools for Sending, FVAP
2016 Election Administration and Voting Survey Comprehensive Report, EAC
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor8
ELECTION DAY
Reality: Election officials provide writing instruments that are approved for marking ballots to all in-person voters using hand-marked paper ballots.

Rumor: Poll workers gave specific writing instruments, such as Sharpies, only to specific voters to cause their ballots to be rejected.

Get the Facts: Election jurisdictions allow voters to mark ballots with varying types of writing instruments, based on state law and other considerations such as tabulation system requirements. Poll workers are required to provide approved writing devices to voters.

Although felt-tip pens, like Sharpies, may bleed through ballots, some election officials have stated that ballot tabulation equipment in their jurisdictions can still read these ballots. Many jurisdictions even design their ballots with offset columns to prevent any potential bleed through from impacting the ability to easily scan both sides of ballots.

If a ballot has issues that impact its ability to be scanned, it can be hand counted or duplicated, or adjudicated by election officials, who use defined procedures such as chain of custody to ensure protect ballot secrecy and integrity. Many states additionally have “voter intent” laws that allow for ballots to be counted even when issues such as bleed-throughs or stray marks are present, as long as the voter’s intent can still be determined.

Useful Sources

After the Voting Ends: The Steps to Complete an Election, NCSL
Ballot Duplication blog series, Council of State Governments Overseas Voting Initiative
Your local or state election officials. EAC state-by-state directory
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor18


Reality: Voters are protected by state and federal law from threats or intimidation at the polls, including from election observers.

Rumor: Observers in the polling place are permitted to intimidate voters, campaign, and interfere with voting.

Get the Facts: While most states have a process to permit a limited number of credentialed or registered observers at in-person voting locations to observe the voting process, state and federal laws offer voters general protection from threats and intimidation, including from observers. States use varying terms for observers, including “poll watchers,” “challengers,” and “poll agents.” In general, observers are prohibited from violating ballot secrecy, campaigning, collecting private voter information, and obstructing or interfering with the voting process. Observers in some states may report potential issues to election officials, such as questioned eligibility of a voter, suspicious behavior, or suspected rule violations. Intimidation or threatening behavior is never permissible.

Under certain circumstances, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division may monitor polling place procedures for the protection of voters under federal voting rights laws. International observers, including delegations from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe or the Organization for American States, who have been invited by the U.S. Department of State, may also observe in-person voting processes in some states.

If you feel that you’ve been a victim of, or witnessed, voter intimidation or threats, please report the experience to the DOJ Civil Rights Division’s Voting Section by phone 800-253-3931 or through its complaint portal at https://civilrights.justice.gov/. If you experience an emergency, please call 911.

Useful Sources

18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(A), 18 U.S.C. § 594, 52 U.S.C. § 20511, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242
Election Crimes and Security, FBI
Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, DOJ
About Federal Observers and Election Monitoring, DOJ
State Laws on Poll Watchers and Challengers, NASS
Poll Watchers and Challengers, NCSL
Policies for Election Observers, NCSL
OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation USA 2020 Factsheet, OSCE
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor13


Reality: Safeguards are in place to protect ballot secrecy.

Rumor: Someone is claiming to know who I voted for.

Get the Facts: Ballot secrecy is guaranteed by law in all states. Election officials implement various safeguards to protect voters’ choices from being viewable or knowable by others, including the election officials themselves. With few exceptions, these security measures ensure that individual ballots, once cast, cannot be traced back to the voters who cast them. For in-person voting, privacy measures include dividers between voting stations and requirements that poll workers maintain distance from voters while they are casting their ballots. For mail-in and provisional voting, election officials follow strict procedures to ensure ballot secrecy when ballots are retrieved from mail-in and provisional ballot envelopes.

Ballot secrecy rights may be voluntarily waived by voters in certain circumstances, and waiver may be required in some of these, such as military and overseas voters that vote by fax or e-mail.

While ballot choices are secret in almost all circumstances, a voter’s party affiliation and history of voting generally are not. Information contained in voter registration records, such as name, address, phone number, and political party affiliation (in states with party-based voter registration), is generally available to political parties and others. This data also regularly contains information on whether a voter voted in a particular election, but not their ballot choices.

Useful Sources

Voting Outside the Polling Place: Absentee, All-Mail and other Voting at Home Options, NCSL
Secrecy of the Ballot and Ballot Selfies, NCSL
States that are Required to Provide Secrecy Sleeves for Absentee/Mail Ballots, NCSL
Access To and Use of Voter Registration Lists, NCSL
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor9


Reality: Polling place lookup sites can experience outages for non-malicious reasons.

Rumor: If polling place lookup sites experience an outage, election infrastructure must have been compromised.

Get the Facts: Polling place lookup sites, like all websites, may experience outages for a variety of reasons, impacting their availability to voters. Polling place lookup sites are not connected to infrastructure that counts votes and are typically segmented from infrastructure that enables voting, such as the voter registration database. Election officials will point potential voters to alternate tools and resources for this information in the event of an issue.

Useful Sources

Election Infrastructure Cyber Risk Assessment, CISA
Election Infrastructure Cyber Risk Infographic, CISA
Your local or state election officials EAC state-by-state directory
Link directly to this rumor by using: https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor10
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד

אוועטאר
Goodmorning
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3845
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך Goodmorning » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:57 pm

איך וועל לאזן די וואס קענען איבערטייטשן
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד

אוועטאר
אוראייניקל
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3386
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג פאברואר 21, 2019 9:05 am

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך אוראייניקל » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:58 pm

דו פארשטייסט יא וואס שטייט דא?

אז ס'פעלט אין הסברה פעלט אין הבנה...

אוועטאר
Goodmorning
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3845
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך Goodmorning » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 6:59 pm

אוראייניקל האט געשריבן:דו פארשטייסט יא וואס שטייט דא?

אז ס'פעלט אין הסברה פעלט אין הבנה...

איך פארשטיי אבער עס וועט נעמען זייער לאנג צו איבערטייטשן.
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד

אוועטאר
אוראייניקל
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3386
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג פאברואר 21, 2019 9:05 am

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך אוראייניקל » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:00 pm

שרייב כאטש א קיצור

shimon7323
שר האלפיים
תגובות: 2697
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג פאברואר 14, 2012 9:21 pm
לאקאציע: שיך
פארבינד זיך:

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך shimon7323 » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:02 pm

א קיצור וואס ער ברענגט איז אז דער קאמפעני זאגט אז זיי קענען וועריפייען אז אלעס איז כשר וישר און מען קען אלעס נאכקוקן, און אויך די גאווערמענט אגענטור שטימט אויך צי אז אלעס איז כשר וישר.
פעיק ניוז האט געשריבן:עס איז מיר בעסער צו זיין א אנעדזשיוקעטעד חכם ווי אן עדזשיוקעטעד טיפש.


שטיצט א איד ווען איר קויפט אויף אמעזאן

KMW
שר האלף
תגובות: 1357
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג פאברואר 23, 2017 11:05 am

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך KMW » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:02 pm

מען האט געבעטן נייעס און אפדעיטס נישט קאפי פעיסטן לאנגע ענגלישע ארטיקלען און מעלדונגען פון די קאמפעני אליינס אז עס איז נישט אמת.
מען בעט נישט צו פארשמירן דעם אשכול.

shimon7323
שר האלפיים
תגובות: 2697
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג פאברואר 14, 2012 9:21 pm
לאקאציע: שיך
פארבינד זיך:

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך shimon7323 » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:03 pm

ליין דא פארוואס טעקסעס האט עס נישט געוואלט.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RSHE6r ... p=drivesdk
פעיק ניוז האט געשריבן:עס איז מיר בעסער צו זיין א אנעדזשיוקעטעד חכם ווי אן עדזשיוקעטעד טיפש.


שטיצט א איד ווען איר קויפט אויף אמעזאן

אוועטאר
פרינדזשעס..
שר חמישים ומאתים
תגובות: 374
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג פאברואר 08, 2018 4:27 pm
לאקאציע: מונקאטש

דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך פרינדזשעס.. » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:21 pm

(קרעדיט: יודישע ווינקל)

Capture_25.JPG
Capture_25.JPG (75.86 KiB) געזעהן 2618 מאל
זאג איך צו אייך מיינע טייערע ברודער אין אמעריקא
איר קאנט האלטן שבת!!! (הרה"ק המנחת אלעזר ממונקאטש זצוקללה"ה)

נטה
שר העשר
תגובות: 13
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: פרייטאג סעפטעמבער 11, 2020 2:54 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך נטה » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:32 pm

אוסף אמרים האט געשריבן:וואלט אפשר געוועהן כדי אז סיי ווער וואס קען די נושא זאל אויסשמיעסען די היסטוריע פון וואל מאשינען. וויאזוי עס ארבעט א.א.וו. און מהנה זיין דעם עולם




"דאמיניאן וואטינג" וועלכע פארפיגט אויף די פעלערהאפטיגע סאפטוועיר און מאשינען וועלכע זענען גענוצט געווארן דורך רוב פון די סווינג שטאטן (אריינגערעכנט אריזאנע, מישיגען, דשארדשיע, פענסילוועניע און נעוואדע) האט פערצופאל פארבינדונגען מיט די קלינטאן פאונדעישן און די אפען סאסייעטי פאונדעישן.

(אויסער דאס וואס עס האט אין מישיגען געטוישט וואוט'ס פון טראמפ צו ביידן ווערט באריכטע דורך פאליטיקאו אז די וואל באאמטע אין דשארדשיע האבן זיך אפגערעדט די טאג פון די וואלן אז די פירמע'ס טעקנישענס האבן 'אפלאודעד "עפעס" און דאס האט געברענגט די גליטש' דער גליטש האט נישט ערלויבט די ארבעטער צו ניצן די מאשינען פאר עטליכע שעה. די קאמפעני האט נישט געגעבן קיין סיבה פאר דעם לעצט מינוטיגער אפדעיט.
איז דאס אלעס א צופאל?

די פירמע האט אין 2014 געגעבן וואל מאשינען פאר א רייע לענדער דורך די קלינטאן פאונדעישן. אין פשוט אידיש מיינט דאס, אז זיי האבן אין 2014 געגעבן ריזיגע דאונעישאנס פאר די קלינטאן פאונדעישן... פעסט פארווערד זעקס יאר און די חברה האבן זייערע פראבלעמאטישע וואל מאשינען אין אלע סווינג סטעיטס.

זייערע מאשינען ארבעטן ווי פאלגענד, מען וואוט אויף א סקרין און די מאשין פרינט דערנאך ארויס א בעלאט מיט א QR קאוד וואס מען סקענט אין אן אנדערע מאשין וועלכע ציילט די שטימע. עס איז נישט דא קיין שום גארענטי אז קיינער קען נישט מאניפולירן דעם קאוד ווייל דער וויילער קען נישט זעהן אויף די בעלאט פאר וועמען ער געבט אפ זיין שטימע און האט נישט די מעגליכקייט צו סקענען דעם QR קאוד צו קאנפירמן אז עס איז גוט רעקארדירט.


It's copy past from a ashkl days ago

KMW
שר האלף
תגובות: 1357
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג פאברואר 23, 2017 11:05 am

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך KMW » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:44 pm

סידני פאוועל טראמפס לויער אויף פאקס

Sidney Powell Drops a BOMB on Sunday Morning Futures:
CIA May have Used Dominion for Its Own Benefit – Gina Haspel Should be Fired Immediately!

Gina Haspel איז דנ דירעקטאר פון די CIA

אוועטאר
ווישוואש
שר חמשת אלפים
תגובות: 5527
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג סעפטעמבער 04, 2014 12:14 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך ווישוואש » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:46 pm

KMW האט געשריבן:סידני פאוועל טראמפס לויער אויף פאקס

Sidney Powell Drops a BOMB on Sunday Morning Futures:
CIA May have Used Dominion for Its Own Benefit – Gina Haspel Should be Fired Immediately!

Gina Haspel איז דנ דירעקטאר פון די CIA

סאו דאס איז וואס קעריק האט געמיינט?
צוגעלייגטע
IMG-20201108-WA0017.jpg
IMG-20201108-WA0017.jpg (24.27 KiB) געזעהן 2333 מאל
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.

shimon7323
שר האלפיים
תגובות: 2697
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג פאברואר 14, 2012 9:21 pm
לאקאציע: שיך
פארבינד זיך:

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך shimon7323 » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:48 pm

ווער איז דער קעריק?
פעיק ניוז האט געשריבן:עס איז מיר בעסער צו זיין א אנעדזשיוקעטעד חכם ווי אן עדזשיוקעטעד טיפש.


שטיצט א איד ווען איר קויפט אויף אמעזאן

אוועטאר
אונגארישער
שר האלף
תגובות: 1526
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג דעצמבער 01, 2008 12:00 pm
לאקאציע: אין שאראש פאטאק

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך אונגארישער » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:52 pm

נאוואדא לייקענען זיי. וואס דען זאלן זיי יעצט טיען?
Liberalism is a mental disorder

אוועטאר
בענקעל
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3348
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג יוני 25, 2015 11:30 am

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך בענקעל » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:52 pm

עס שפירן זעך פרייליכע האפענונגען מיט די ברעיקינג נייעסן איבער דאמיניען. אבער מיט א ניכטערן בליק איז דאס א גרויסע סכנה פאר די סטאביליטעט פונעם לאנד אויב די אלע קלאנגען שטעלן זיך ארויס צו זיין ריכטיג.

ווידעראום, אויב לאזט מען עס דורך איז עס אויך א סכנה.
לעצט פאראכטן דורך בענקעל אום זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:54 pm, מאל פאראכטן געווארן 1 סך הכל.

אוועטאר
Goodmorning
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3845
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך Goodmorning » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:53 pm

מען דארף אבער קענען אויפווייזן פארוואס זייערע ענטפערס זענען נישט אמת. סתם חלומען קען יעדער
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד

shimon7323
שר האלפיים
תגובות: 2697
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג פאברואר 14, 2012 9:21 pm
לאקאציע: שיך
פארבינד זיך:

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך shimon7323 » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:56 pm

Goodmorning האט געשריבן:מען דארף אבער קענען אויפווייזן פארוואס זייערע ענטפערס זענען נישט אמת. סתם חלומען קען יעדער



איינער וואס איז נוגע לדבר, דארף איך נישט קיין ענטפערס, אויב ווילסטו ווייזען אויפריכטיגקייט דאן עפען עס אויף פאר די פובליק אדער אויספארשער. נישט קיין תירוצים . ביי מיר און ארבעט קען איך אויך אויפווייזן מיט פעפער טרעילס זאכן וואס איז קיינמאל נישט געווען.
פעיק ניוז האט געשריבן:עס איז מיר בעסער צו זיין א אנעדזשיוקעטעד חכם ווי אן עדזשיוקעטעד טיפש.


שטיצט א איד ווען איר קויפט אויף אמעזאן

Programming
שר האלף
תגובות: 1222
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג ינואר 16, 2017 8:53 pm

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך Programming » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:56 pm

בענקעל האט געשריבן:עס שפירן זעך פרייליכע האפענונגען מיט די ברעיקינג נייעסן איבער דאמיניען. אבער מיט א ניכטערן בליק איז דאס א גרויסע סכנה פאר די סטאביליטעט פונעם לאנד אויב די אלע קלאנגען שטעלן זיך ארויס צו זיין ריכטיג.

ווידעראום, אויב לאזט מען עס דורך איז עס אויך א סכנה.


קודם מאך די קעיס, נאכדעם וועלן מיר רעדן וועגן די סכנה

אוועטאר
טשאדעלע באדעלע
שר שבעת אלפים
תגובות: 7879
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.

Re: דאמיניאן פעלטשונגען

תגובהדורך טשאדעלע באדעלע » זונטאג נובעמבער 15, 2020 7:56 pm

מרת פאוועל איז נישט קיין קינדערגארטן קינד. זי האט איבערגעדרייט מייקל פלין׳ס קעיס אויך און אויפגעדעקט די הפקירות׳דיגע ווירטשאפט אינערהאלב די איטעליגענט קאמיוניטיס, אין וועם יעדע אמעריקאנער האט געמיזט גלייבן באמונה שלימה אז זיי לאזן זייער בייעסט אינדערהיים ביים גיין צו די ארבעט.. ווער געדענקט די אוטרעידזש אויף די ״חוצפה״.. ווען טראמפ האט גערעדט אפענע דברי כפירה קעגן די גרופע מאפיאנערן.. ס׳האט גענומען א שטיק צייט, ער איז אבער גערעכט געווען.

וועט די וואלן סיסטעם זיין די צווייטע קרבן נאך די קאומי, מ׳קעיב, סטראק, פעידזש און ברענען קליקע? ווער ווייסט.
“Wait For Tomorrow

- Rudy Giuliani


צוריק צו “אידישע און וועלטליכע נייעס”